Recent Comments

Good point.

Looks interesting and wonderful. Now, let's see what happens.

This very emotional topic needs objective definitions, specifically of rights, and, as mentioned, one can’t abrogate one right to support another. There are two fundamentals regarding rights: individuated and social context—neither of which applies to the unborn. As horrendous as this “choice” may be, the fluid subjective interpretation of when the “right to life” begins needs an objective base. I’ve altered my view over the years to place that point at the moment the biological process of birthing begins (at whatever measurable biological point), the custodial transfer of that right begins, and any voluntary termination thereafter should be outlawed and is immoral. Because one “can” legally do something does not mean they should. The right to suicide is such an example. As an additional aside, any rational determination as to “when” the mother can decide needs to include the medical reality that the further along in the pregnancy, the greater the chance for her own individual medical well-being to be compromised, a fact that should be considered from the moment of the sexual act, to fertilization, through the various stages, to ultimately when the body begins the natural process of birthing.

Correct on what Ayn Rand had to say. I don't agree with her as she decided being human starts at birth and I submit it starts at conception. Others argue many points in between. I hold a great respect for Rand and the Objectivism she gave us, but I don't believe in her infallibility any more than a pope.

A human fetus is not a parasite but is a living being maturing through the natural gestational period of a normal life cycle ensuring the propagation and survival of the species. IMHO, Your use of the word parasite is misapplied as your definition can be applied to a 5 year old, a 10 year old, or even a 30 year old living off his/her parents or others.

I miss the days of Flip Wilson humor! I was skimming through the YouTube channel a few days ago and caught a couple of Dean Martin roasts. Hilariously brutal and will never bee seen nowadays. Black celebrities were just as obsessed with race then, but made more light of it.

Yes She is not a victum

... and the 'host' made a decision that created the 'parasite' in this case.

"A fetus is a parasitic potential human being."

The internet defines a parasite as:
"A parasite is a living thing that grows, feeds, and lives on or inside another animal or plant—known as the host. The parasite gets food and shelter from the host, but it does not give anything back, and it usually harms the host..."

What harm to the woman is done by the baby in her womb? Does this apply to all mammalian females, or only human ones?

The parasite always invades the host. The fetus is not a thing prior to its conception, therefore, it cannot invade anything

I think it should be allowed to about age 10 as Johnathan Swift suggested.

The typical leftist has three goals - orgasms, power and money.

For the nihilists and the materialists, ethics, morality, honor, character, honesty, etc. are old-fashioned concepts, replaced by "values" - which are as enduring as the brittle leaves clinging to a late-autumn tree..

This is how Ayn Rand framed the issue. Her view was that the fetus has no rights until it is born. Not saying I agree with her, just pointing it out since this site is ostensibly dedicated to her philosophy.

Agreed ... a soft, compliant, wimpy collective of no-accounts seeking status that they have never actually earned.

The Civil War Opponents has been my favorite for quite some time.

AOC and Smart Water -- the bigger picture is that a great many young people identify with this mediocre nitwit.

Otto Penn -- A cover with a photo of Biden looking closely at an ice cream cone might have been better.

The kool-aid hair youth seeking status through superficial low-resolution expression -- the leitmotif of a soft, compliant, indolent, ignorant generation.

That one with a Vampire, Superman and a Liberal ... the disconnect is that the Liberal, unlike a Vampire or Superman, has no objectively measurable power, either physical or intellectual, that would be minimized in the context of Facts. For the Liberal, it is all about Their Truth, Their Feelings and Their Story... Facts and Objectivity are not party to Their World.

Thank you, Carl.

Me the dino just enjoyed a self-imposed fantasy. This was how it went~~I was there when all those libtarded dingbats applauded.
Once they all finished that applause, I offered to pass out as many cyanide pills I had somehow acquired, stating that their pill-popping
would offer relief for the breathing space of an overpopulated planet.
Yes, I know that in real life~~most especially in a blue state~~I'd be charged for attempted murder.

The Babylon Bee was all over this, with great accuracy:

https://babylonbee.com/news/massachus...

One of too many brainwashed vain know-it-all ignorant losers who couldn't find a way out of a wet paper bag.

AOC: She was using it wrong. Since she has sh!t for brains, should needed to use it as an Enema.

But good luck with that, it would require she take her head out of her a$$...

Funny Take:

I am BOTH Pro-Life and Pro-Choice!!!

1) I am Pro-Life for the mother
2) I am Pro-Choice for the Fetus
(I want to raise that fetus up to a full grown person, and then give it the choice. MAID (Canada) makes that very possible...

LOL.

BTW, this is the only logical approach, to me.
Otherwise, the fetus doesn't get a chance to object!

Sanger is literally quoted telling the Democrats that "We can NEVER let the blacks know this is about them..." and the pastors will make sure to push that version in their communities, in case it starts to leak.

LMAO. And then they get them to STAND IN LINE and SCREAM FOR IT.

Truly Amazing.
Truly Sickening.
Truly Disgusting...

The most dangerous place in America... Is being in a black woman's uterus!

For me, seeing a baby, particularly a happy baby ALWAYS brings a smile to my face. It doesn't matter the color, gender whatever. They instantly get a warm place in my heart. The thought of killing them changed my mind on abortion!

The one with the blue hair pretty well sums up the current state of affairs.

Those pills would have only had a chance to work if they had been available during Trump's term at the first sign of TDS. Even then, they would probably not have prevented transmission to those around them.

Even at that (rape or incest), why is the child the one to be destroyed?

My (now ex-) wife and lost a full term perfectly healthy girl when my ex had a seizure on the delivery table. Almost lost the wife, did lose our daughter. The thought of someone willfully killing a human that is mere minutes from being born (now legal in Massachusetts) makes me angry almost beyond any self-control. When I saw them all laughing around the governor's desk as she signed it, it was as close as I've ever been to understanding what goes on in the mind of a mass murderer. I lost a small chunk of my day as I tried to reel my emotions back in. How can anyone justify cold blooded murder? I'm still really upset about both the law itself and the apparent glee they all showed in that clip. Sorry for the rant, everyone.

Liberal women packed the room and gleefully cheered. This is madness. These people are insane. Perhaps a gene for self-deletion is packed into those individuals that are insane. Thinking -- is this the sort of collective human behavior that occurs during the apex of the decadent phase of empire? I think Rand also said something along the lines of -- You can choose to ignore reality, but you cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring reality. These lunatics want to have their cake and eat it too -- to breed (copulate) without consequences. For my own part, I choose to have little to do with the insane, keeping my physical and intellectual distance from them.