Yes, but it not worth looking at their graphs, well I did.
Some are real dodgy, eg
fossil fuel subsidies, a fallacy from funny accounting,
Brazil's rain forest, yes a decline this year from fire but no significant long term change,
tree cover loss increasing, dubious, no mention of proportion of earth's surface under vegetation -it is growing, satellite imagery evidence,
more CO2, but from USA declining from increased energy efficiency, from China already the largest contributor and growing with a free hand under the Paris Agreement,
some graphs show more CO2, so what? there is no CO2 temperature link from theory or observation,
meat eating is growing but so is human health, height, and life expectancy,
etc.

It's as if they didn't even bother looking at their own Graph b, which shows declining fertility rates.

Solutions to problems that do not exist will create disasters.

This is the Malthus prediction dug up!
Population always increases faster than food supply.
A disaster that did not happen due to the industrial revolution.
That came from scientific thinking (not The Science), property rights (private not community), free speech (not suppression of whatever they call hate-speech)

Among the most revolting aspects of this hysteria mongering is that these 'scientists' cannot be bothered to run the basic numbers.

Today, the world population is approximately 7 billion humans. The population densities of Hong Kong and Singapore are approximately 6,500 individuals per square kilometer. These are wealthy, modern cities, proving that a lot of people can live well in a tight space. If all of the individual humans in the world were contained within an area that were a bit larger than 1 million square kilometers, that would result in a population density comparable to those of Hong Kong and Singapore, and it would leave the entire rest of the surface of the earth available for energy and food production, manufacturing, and waste processing.

There is no 'overpopulation'. There is only mismanagement.

Yet another collectivist based solution to put in “the greater good” category.