Yes, they are ‘coming after your guns’ ... if you carry them outside your house - 9th Circuit "RULES" There Is No Right To Carry A Gun In Public, Re-writing the Second Amendment
Posted by freedomforall 4 years, 1 month ago to Government
The right of the People to keep and BEAR ARMS shall not be infringed.
It could not be clearer that the 9th Circuit is in violation of the constitution and they have violated their oaths. Treason.
Execute traitors.
It could not be clearer that the 9th Circuit is in violation of the constitution and they have violated their oaths. Treason.
Execute traitors.
It seems they want to redefine the phrase "the people" in the 2nd Amendment to mean "the state". Once that is accomplished then the phrase "We The People" becomes "We The State".
Even more so, how the hell would one not publicly "bear" a warship?
"A warship, you say?" I do.
ARTICLE I, SECTION 8, CLAUSE 11
The Congress shall have Power To ...grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal....
How does one capture or sink warships? With other warships. The constitution, a written, expected private citizens to own the absolute pinnacle of military tech: the naval warship. Further, after (IIRC) the War of 1812 in which we issued said letters to private citizens while we build tup a small navy, we then sold most of them to private citizens when done with them.
Kinda hard, especially in those days, to keep warships in one's home and not out in public.
https://rense.com/general69/paper.htm
"Members of Congress have proposed some 11,000 amendments over the last decade, ranging from repeal of the right to bear arms to a Constitutional ban on abortion." - 12/9/2005
We belong to an affinity group (local atheist organization) which is historically very liberal. We are FOUNDING members, plus had been attending meetings for 10+ years, when someone commented about "those horrible people who run around with guns." My husband calmly stated "You have NEVER seen me unarmed." This was 100% true. I thought their heads were going to explode. The look on their faces was absolutely priceless.
Hold them to their own rulebooks and standards. Mandate harsh un unbiased enforcement of bad laws. These are (two of, and IMO the most effective) the ways those problems are handled.
If a lefty calls for people to be pilloried and "canceled" over something (ie. blackface or language), but is exposed as having done the same thing - they get equal and we should call for it and be explicit about it being because they did do and we are simply holding them to their own standards and rules.
They want quotas at hiring? Fine, enforce them on them. If that means a particular minority group only represents, say 4% of an area's population, nobody can hire more than 4% of their workforce from that population.
You have to enforce bad laws and rules in order to get them gone. Not doing so is the very foundation of corrupt law and preferential treatment. Preferential treatment and favored exemption was actually a core part of what lead to the Boston Tea Party.
I believe that would be "Democrat." Though "politician" would also suffice.
And those family members , are those who share a belief in God, family and country.
A freeborn people are not required to submit to tyranny, but are allowed to utilize all tools necessary to maintain their essential liberties, especially from their creation at law.