"What's the new allowable wording for "Indian Giver"?"

I believe that would be "Democrat." Though "politician" would also suffice.

Because Alinksy's "Rules for Radicals" was, and still is, widely misconstrued as a leftist writing for leftists. It was not. It was codification of long understood (at the time) proven techniques for breaking the abuses of those in power.

Hold them to their own rulebooks and standards. Mandate harsh un unbiased enforcement of bad laws. These are (two of, and IMO the most effective) the ways those problems are handled.

If a lefty calls for people to be pilloried and "canceled" over something (ie. blackface or language), but is exposed as having done the same thing - they get equal and we should call for it and be explicit about it being because they did do and we are simply holding them to their own standards and rules.

They want quotas at hiring? Fine, enforce them on them. If that means a particular minority group only represents, say 4% of an area's population, nobody can hire more than 4% of their workforce from that population.

You have to enforce bad laws and rules in order to get them gone. Not doing so is the very foundation of corrupt law and preferential treatment. Preferential treatment and favored exemption was actually a core part of what lead to the Boston Tea Party.

"... there are no restrictions or specifications in the Constitution governing on where to bear."

Even more so, how the hell would one not publicly "bear" a warship?

"A warship, you say?" I do.

ARTICLE I, SECTION 8, CLAUSE 11
The Congress shall have Power To ...grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal....

How does one capture or sink warships? With other warships. The constitution, a written, expected private citizens to own the absolute pinnacle of military tech: the naval warship. Further, after (IIRC) the War of 1812 in which we issued said letters to private citizens while we build tup a small navy, we then sold most of them to private citizens when done with them.

Kinda hard, especially in those days, to keep warships in one's home and not out in public.

And what stopped the shooter in the market? Was it not an off duty LE with a gun? Yes he died. But how many did he save by having a gun. What if one more person had carried that day? I never go to WalMart unarmed- just saying.

I'm grandfathered for my right to bear arms. They gave me one, and put me in change of a bunch more, taught me how to use them, then sent me some 8000 miles away to do so. Then they wouldn't allow me to bring any back with me, so I legally bought some of my own. What's the new allowable wording for "Indian Giver"?

My hearth and home is all inclusive of the lands of the United States. Where ever I walk is my front yard. My hearth can be at my brother or sister’s house.

And those family members , are those who share a belief in God, family and country.

A freeborn people are not required to submit to tyranny, but are allowed to utilize all tools necessary to maintain their essential liberties, especially from their creation at law.

And, in ignorance, the People comply.

Sadly that's too true.

What PART of "shall not be infringed" do the 9th Circus judges NOT get?

This country is lost for good. We are going to be ruled by the left, with no recourse with elections, and no way to overthrow them. Time to hide in plain sight, or move out of the USA.

Absolutely true, but we figured we messed with them enough for that day. We'll save the "lady" part for later! :-)

They will never get everyone's firearms. And specially will never get even half the people to comply. Millions of firearms will have magically vanished.

The problem with most judges now days its they think they have more power than they legally have.

Exactly. That's my point. Of course, the next step is to get rid of concealed carry.

Bad people, at least the ones I've met, usually use concealed carry. They don't worry that they might need a "concealed-carry permit" because they know that as felons they are not allowed to have firearms at all. When murder perp photos appear in our local newspaper it is difficult to avoid making rude jokes about "ethnically challenged" individuals who are also ethically challenged.

Listen Big Bush lost me when I figured out he wanted to be President of the World. One World Order! Baloney.

Hear ye! Hear ye!" the town crier cried, ringing his spanky clanky cow bell. "Hear ye loyal subjects the latest proclamation issued by his majesty King George of the Royal House of Bush! Hip! Hip! Hooray! To hear is to obey!"

Well a whole lot of Texas ladies have those cute little items in their handbags. With a permit to carry.

I don't know about this time, but I do remember reading in the past that they have done this previously. Absolutely insane. We don't go by European and Colonial laws! (BTW I googled it but didn't have time to go through all the entries that popped up).

I'm all for that, though we don't carry openly, simply not to give any misanthrope a clue.

We belong to an affinity group (local atheist organization) which is historically very liberal. We are FOUNDING members, plus had been attending meetings for 10+ years, when someone commented about "those horrible people who run around with guns." My husband calmly stated "You have NEVER seen me unarmed." This was 100% true. I thought their heads were going to explode. The look on their faces was absolutely priceless.

Makes me wonder WHY we don't copy them more? Yeah I know, they're liars, criminals, you name it, but they get what they want. Can't we employ the same tactics in service of GOOD things?

Every day. Crime drops to zero (except for white collar legalized looting by Wall St, th banking cartel, and politicians.)

The SCOTUS can't be trusted to defend the Constitution either.

I think that among the states that allow open carry there should be an "open carry day".