[Ask the Gulch] When the dirt hits the fan will you be covered up or will you be digging out? There are only two sides to this fight, Those who are willing to fight and defend America (and the world) or you will be on the side trying to hit the Re Set Button.
Posted by N316Jobs 3 years, 6 months ago to Ask the Gulch
I think this a very real risk, a huge risk. I think part of it comes from as an indirect consequence of handheld video devices. You can give them to kids in places like the grocery store, and it will entertain them so they don't wave their hands and knock things over or hit people by accident. But then they never get the lesson that they can take action (waving their hands) and actions have consequences, so you have take action responsibly. I think this trend continues throughout childhood development. There aren't as many kids out playing in the neighborhood, and many of them would be scared to do anything without supervision, so if parents want them off handheld video, they put them in structured activities where someone tells them what to do. Adulthood is terrifying when it arrives because they've never taken the baby steps that come before it. As you say, people want a parent. I think this is one of the biggest problems the world faces.
Fundamental, radical change doesn't happen when people are destitute, but when they're too comfortable. Humans tend to be a reactive species, which is what made us strong survivors, and when there's a lack of stressors, even minor disturbances become magnified. When "microaggressions" become perceived as big a problem as starvation, things get seriously tilted in the direction of artificial crisis, demanding leadership that offers even more comfort for the already comfortable. We're inviting dictatorship, seeking a national "parent" to tell us everything will be fine if we're obedient children.
I'm for making it easy for people who are not criminals and not looking for a handout to come legally. I'm for a path to legal residency or citizenship for people who've been here under the radar. But I think we should be serious about enforcing the laws against people staying here under the radar and people interacting with them and treating them like an underclass.
I think of America as an idea, not a nation, something for all humankind.
My old thought on the Constitution was it was to limit what people could vote for. If someone shoots up a school, people might vote to take away everyone's guns and allow the police to inspect everyone's home at will to prevent further crimes. The Constitution forbids that, even if it's the will of the majority. I used to think the Constitution needed to establish structures to prevent people from voting for those government powers. Now I think people must accept the philosophy of the Constitution or they'll just find a way around it.
"a Godless people"
The Constitution forbids establishing a state religion, and I'm completely godless.
I would like it to be true that if you just dismantled a corrupt system set up by and for scoundrels, the people would insist on a more limited government.
Unfortunately I think most people are for government spending and intrusiveness and are socially conservative.
I definitely would like to be wrong and find out expansion of government was actually a plot by a small group, not something popularly supported.
I'm glad if my thoughts were helpful, but I don't agree with the bigotry and name-calling in your comment. I'm against religious bigtory, for pluralism, mostly supportive of President Obama, and I'm for increased immigration.
I really want that, but ewv convinced me that it must come from the people accepting the vision of a constitutionally-constrained liberal democracy. A Constitution can't force people to follow it. More than ever in my life, mainstream candidates for office don't even give lip service to limited government; it won't happen through voting. I'll keep contributing to reasonable candidates, but I have no faith it will make a difference in these long-term trends. As soon as polls start saying people are concerned about liberty and the framework that constrains government, that's when there will be change.
North Korea and China try hard to have full freedom for invention but authoritarianism for questioning the government. I think you're right that such a plan can't work well, and that's a good thing.
http://lh3.googleusercontent.com/1dxf...
A few good centuries can be undone VERY quickly.
Load more comments...