The Wuhan Cover-Up by RFK, Jr.: Review and Analysis
Posted by freedomforall 1 year, 2 months ago to Books
Excerpt:
"The story in the Wuhan Cover-Up that interests me is the rise of the biowarfare-industrial-complex – the global behemoth comprising military/intelligence alliances, Big Pharma, Big Tech, academic and medical institutions, and NGOs – that both created the virus known as SARS-CoV-2 and ran the global response to it.
In this article, I will highlight key parts of The Wuhan Cover-Up that pertain to this storyline – which I believe are downplayed in its publicity materials and are one of the main reasons it has been practically banned from polite society: The book has been so heavily censored that I cannot find a single actual review on Google. Newsweek reported that independent bookstores do not want to carry it.
A lot of the censorship has to do with mainstream animosity toward RFK, Jr’s presidential campaign. But the explosive content of the book, as reviewed in this article, is also likely a factor.
...
Subtopics:
-How the Nature of Biowarfare Research Has Not Changed
-Deep CIA-Biowarfare Ties
-Shockingly Broad Participation by Academics and "Scientists"
-Moral Bankruptcy
-Bioweapons Research = Vaccine Research
-From an Obsession of US National Security to a Tool of Globalism
-China Becomes a Dominant Biowarfare Research Player
-Why Would the US Do Bioweapons Research in/for China?
-A Convergence of Personal, Political, Financial and Global Interests
...
It was especially gratifying to me to read The Wuhan Cover-Up (all 600 pages of it), because it validated my own research, showing that the pandemic response was led by the national security/intelligence arms of government, not public health agencies.
In fact, after reading the first few chapters – the ones that go into the history of chemical and biological warfare and the rise of the biowarfare-industrial-complex – I paradoxically felt an enormous sense of relief.
Finally, we have a detailed account that shows – beyond what I would consider a reasonable doubt – that the entire Covid catastrophe was caused, and led, by a multinational military-intelligence-academic-pharma-tech-NGO cabal.
RFK, Jr.’s conclusion is that we should look to a future “in which the bio-elites are held responsible for their actions, people regain their rights, and the Constitution is restored to its intended preeminence.”
But how do we do that?
I am afraid, based on the information in his own book, and the fact that RFK, Jr. himself is being censored and banned so extensively from the public square, that the solution to the problems he exposes is much more difficult and complex than just “holding the bio-elites responsible” which will somehow lead to people regaining their rights."
"The story in the Wuhan Cover-Up that interests me is the rise of the biowarfare-industrial-complex – the global behemoth comprising military/intelligence alliances, Big Pharma, Big Tech, academic and medical institutions, and NGOs – that both created the virus known as SARS-CoV-2 and ran the global response to it.
In this article, I will highlight key parts of The Wuhan Cover-Up that pertain to this storyline – which I believe are downplayed in its publicity materials and are one of the main reasons it has been practically banned from polite society: The book has been so heavily censored that I cannot find a single actual review on Google. Newsweek reported that independent bookstores do not want to carry it.
A lot of the censorship has to do with mainstream animosity toward RFK, Jr’s presidential campaign. But the explosive content of the book, as reviewed in this article, is also likely a factor.
...
Subtopics:
-How the Nature of Biowarfare Research Has Not Changed
-Deep CIA-Biowarfare Ties
-Shockingly Broad Participation by Academics and "Scientists"
-Moral Bankruptcy
-Bioweapons Research = Vaccine Research
-From an Obsession of US National Security to a Tool of Globalism
-China Becomes a Dominant Biowarfare Research Player
-Why Would the US Do Bioweapons Research in/for China?
-A Convergence of Personal, Political, Financial and Global Interests
...
It was especially gratifying to me to read The Wuhan Cover-Up (all 600 pages of it), because it validated my own research, showing that the pandemic response was led by the national security/intelligence arms of government, not public health agencies.
In fact, after reading the first few chapters – the ones that go into the history of chemical and biological warfare and the rise of the biowarfare-industrial-complex – I paradoxically felt an enormous sense of relief.
Finally, we have a detailed account that shows – beyond what I would consider a reasonable doubt – that the entire Covid catastrophe was caused, and led, by a multinational military-intelligence-academic-pharma-tech-NGO cabal.
RFK, Jr.’s conclusion is that we should look to a future “in which the bio-elites are held responsible for their actions, people regain their rights, and the Constitution is restored to its intended preeminence.”
But how do we do that?
I am afraid, based on the information in his own book, and the fact that RFK, Jr. himself is being censored and banned so extensively from the public square, that the solution to the problems he exposes is much more difficult and complex than just “holding the bio-elites responsible” which will somehow lead to people regaining their rights."
Patriots are not related in any way to occupant traitors of D.C.
Whites have changed the world in thousands of ways that made it better for everyone.
"We" whites have nothing against change; we thrive with it and it makes us more productive.
Change that is irrational and destructive is one thing that we oppose and so should anyone who can think rationally.
The person is a brainwashed fool and doesn't deserve your respect (outside of his training and narrow expertise.)
People who want to tear things down don't seem to be into the rebuilding part. They have no idea how to rebuild.
He wants to see these systems UNDONE, as he believes they have perpetrated evil unto his people (or non-whites). Never mind his college education, never mind his well paying job.
He thinks I am upset over the browning of America. I told him it's not the melanin content it is the content of the LACK of character. That you guys are celebrating thugs getting let out of a courthouse with no charges after beating up cops... And people being cancelled for speaking the truth.
Strange how tearing down something they didn't build because they don't like it is somehow better than going somewhere else and building your own.
I did agree with him that the CURRENT system is NOT worth saving. But the systems here in the 1970s were pretty good.
And I warned him. I saw Obama get rid of the Generals who would not attack Americans. Then they made the military a place that discouraged good old boys from joining. Now that their recruiting numbers SUCK they are going to offer citizenship to those ILLEGALS who join the military, so that when they are asked to shoot Americans... They won't care. It won't be family to them...
And I finished by reminding him that VERY WEALTH WHITE MEN are running all of this. directing it, and getting our government to fund the NGOs that are actually pushing these things...
And it won't stop when the country changes... When you think it will be your turn to have some power... You will find that the people in charge will knock you down, in favor of a different minority, using the same playbook.
He's not evil. He's misguided.
I would agree with that. In this case, fighting the left with reason when the opponent is only into power isn't effective. I am presenting the argument that if the left promotes policies which will only destroy themselves - isnt it more effective to let them employ those policies to their eventual ruin (as in Atlas Shrugged scenario)? In the end, I think most people live with results, not ideology and the left will be left with very few supporters. The cumulative results of open borders, inflation, high taxes, deficit spending, weaponization of justice, WOKE policies, rampant abortion, allowing smash and grab with no consequences will eventually take a bigger toll on leftist supporters than any rands philosophical arguments. IMHO
But if it is evil, we must fight.
If it is evil that is peaking in power, a strategic withdraw is likely warranted.
All evil needs to succeed is for good people to do nothing when they see it!
But I will not kneel, and I would prefer to take ONE of them out (at a minimum) with me.
If every patriot lived that way. The evil would end sooner. It's the inverse of the prisoners dilemma.
It's the Guards Dilemma... Once enough prisoners cross the line. They are ALL crossing the line.
Getting old means a life sentence is probably a reasonable exchange... LOL
To fight in the USA amounts to either allowing the left and their ideology to destroy the county and lose their constuents' approval ( (The atlas shrugged method in the novel), OR to fight and kill them dead. Either way is not really that great- War gets a lot of people on both sides killed, allowing the country to go to hell is less lethal for the good guys if they prepare to take care of themselves and not be dependent on the benefits of a working society to help.
One can never learn enough about history.
Else be doomed to repeat it.
Did you ever hear the story of the man in Australia whom it was traced to be the true British royal in the line of succession?
Something about the Windsors claim is based on an illegitimate (Bastard-born) child.
He had the proof documented old manuscripts and family bibles, but wanted no part of the royal BS and trappings.
The researcher who tracked him down (to make the film) had copies of all the same documents. They matched perfectly.
The true heir to the royal throne tends sheep (I think he is an auctioneer of livestock) and drinks his pints at the local tavern, the only life he wants.
If you are looking for Strider and the Return Of The King, check your local tavern, I think you'll find him there.
You know that obscure thing: The Nuremberg Trials
Meanwhile, many of my colleagues related to me all the side effects and trauma they went through, only to find out they should have followed their heart and resisted.
Where do they go to get their health back?
in the late 50's we got two jabs. Polio and small pox. TB was around but they didn't do any PM about it.
We all got German measles, mumps, chicken pox, strep throat, (probably a dozen other things we couldn't pronounce) but we al lived. Don't know any kid who died or had lasting symptoms. This was the baby boom, every family had four or more kids.
Parents intentionally spend it around so we were all sick at once, easier to care for.
Heard immunity, what a concept!
You know what's funny, my mother never got sick, ever, with anything. To her dying day at 91. But then again she was one of the few of her generation that didn't smoke or drink, though she did work in all the local mills under horrendous conditions. Things they would never allow today.
It is no surprise the swamp waited for the Greatest Generation to die off before pulling all this crap.
My parents would have told us not to worry about the bugs and the financial perturbations because they went all through this before, and they didn't die.
The the (manufactured) Great Depression was tough, but as my parents always said: "what doesn't kill you, makes you stronger."
WE need to stop fearing fear. It is a weapon being used against us. It only works when we let it. This pussywhipped country needs to Cowboy Up and grow a pair.
Trans idiots are transitioning into mass psychosis. Let em' go. They're an evolutionary dead end. I can just imagine what my (WWII vet) dad would have said about these clowns.
The phase "softer than a sneaker full of sh!t" seems to come to mind
My wife and I for a while recently were getting at least weekly calls from various friends who suddenly came down with cancer. Several were diagnosis to death within a couple months. "Turbo cancer" is the term that took hold. Yeah...Not supposed to talk about any of that either. This is the end. If they can get away with this it's the end, in my opinion.
Hitler was Prussian controlled just like most leaders in the west today. Erich Ludendorff Prussian general who was mainly responsible for Germany's military policy and strategy in the latter years of World War I , enlisted Hitler in early 1920 Wiemer Rep. He was then Groomed to rise to power. Stalin also was a Prussian Goon following Karl Marx (Prussian) Communism. The Bolshevik Revolution was Prussian funded. BTW Prussia also has had control of GB when the House of Orange replaced A British Royalty with a Prussian Blood line. On the 5 November 1688, William of Orange sailed his fleet of over 450 ships, unopposed by the Royal Navy, into Torbay harbour and landed his troops in Devon. Gathering local support, he marched his army, now 20,000 strong, on to London in The Glorious Revolution. Queen Victoria's eldest son Edward VII belonged to the House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha (the family name of his father Prince Albert). Edward VII's son George V became the second king of that dynasty when he succeeded to the throne in 1910.
In 1917, there was a radical change, when George V specifically adopted Windsor, not only as the name of the 'House' or dynasty, but also as the surname of his family. The family name was changed as a result of anti-German feeling during the First World War, and the name Windsor was adopted after the Castle of the same name.
In '39, Germany attacked Poland from the East, simultaneously Russia attacked Poland from the West.
You never hear much about what happened, other than Germany ended up with the whole enchilada.
Did they meet in the middle and start attacking each other?
Inquiring minds want to know.
Against a far better equipped and trained enemy. At that time, the Brits were the best Army and Navy in the world.
That's only 1% of the entire 13 colonies population.
That works out to about 3.8 million in todays population figures.
Using gorilla tactics as our forbearers did...
As the old say goes, "The last thing I want to do is to hurt someone, but it's still on the list."
I am afraid to ask... did he get the jab?
The reason I ask is have have lost three friends in the last three months to cancer, my mother last year and another friend who got a autoimmune disease,
To this day, they have not identified what disease he actually died from.
They all got the jab.
I get a call almost every week from another relative, friend or a friends child diagnosed with cancer. I dare not ask.
Our Young people seem to be getting hit harder than us old goats. Something smells very wrong about this.
Type it into the lyingass web, and they say it's because the young are eating junk food and are too lethargic. You have to go down 10 pages before you start seeing the real statistics.
And if junk food is causing cancer... why the hell is it still being sold!
There is a cancer epidemic happening to our young people and the government is in full coverup mode.
I just watched a documentary about what is happening in China.
Xi, or whateverthehell his name is, is deliberately destroying their country. Their people may have been turned into sheep, but they see what their government is doing to them, but they have no fight left in them. Sad.
Our country is also being deliberately torn asunder. There is no disease X that is not part of a larger plan. What that plan is, I can only guess.
Just like China....More societal control.
The "Black Swan" is a black pig. It's baked into the cake.
Again conjecture, but financial control aka CBDCs are an excellent bet.
The cabal, the deep state, the swap whatever you want to call them, want the middle class destroyed.
They are well on their way to getting their wish.
At some point we got to play our hand while we still can.
I grew up in a working class town that was as rough as they get. You learn to fight, or you learn to get beat up.
I got plenty of beatings, but I always went down swinging. That part of me is not going to change.
Load more comments...