14

STRAIGHT LOGIC (From today's edition of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL)

Posted by Maritimus 10 years, 3 months ago to Politics
44 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

‘Secular Stagnation’ and the Cheap Burger
What do Sheldon Silver, the European Central Bank, and McDonald’s have in common?

By
Holman W. Jenkins, Jr.
Jan. 23, 2015 6:21 p.m. ET
It may seem peculiar to link the arrest of New York Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver with the European Central Bank’s latest monetary legerdemain. And even more peculiar to link both with the troubles of McDonald’s.
But Europe, Japan and the U.S. have been desperate to stir private-sector growth and yet refuse to consider how they treat their private sector. Europe gave itself austerity in which the private sector shrank and the government didn’t. Big-name economists keep insisting monetary policy can conjure growth without anyone having to question any ideological, political or policy embraces of the past three decades.
Nobody asks: How can we make our societies ones in which people find opportunity? They worry about the distribution of income but not the absence of income-creating opportunities for individuals.
The lesson of Sheldon Silver is that this phenomenon has mostly to do with a self-interested machine protecting its own privileges.
Mr. Silver, as you may know, is the long-serving speaker of the New York state assembly, a man the New York Times calls the state’s “most powerful Democrat” and the capital’s “most powerful figure.” He was arrested Thursday for millions of dollars in graft. Two decades of his “service” is why upstate New York is America’s microcosm of France, a place of permanent stagnation. It can’t even avail itself of fracking, as Pennsylvania and Ohio have done, because fracking displeases the disconnected New York City liberals whom Mr. Silver must propitiate to keep himself in power decade after decade.
McDonald’s has had two bad years, and sales are down sharply in the U.S. Meanwhile, Shake Shack is seeking an IPO on Wall Street that would value the tiny chain at $568 million.
This has led some to draw a line of causation, but McDonald’s doesn’t compete for the same customers and its real future may lie more in cost control than in imitating the boutique burger chains like Shake Shack and Five Guys.
McDonald’s has decades of experience in Europe and Japan, and can see where things are going. Our youth unemployment may be half of France’s, but it’s twice the rate that prevailed at a similar point in the 1990s recovery. Our new business formations are the lowest in 35 years, more like Europe than the U.S. According to Gallup, companies are dying faster than new ones are being born.
The administration’s Affordable Care Act raises costs for businesses like McDonald’s that hire thousands of full-time workers at a low wage. Its labor enforcers are overturning settled law to make McDonald’s liable for alleged violations of its independent franchises.
A writer for the New Yorker applauds academic studies showing that hikes in the minimum wage have only a small impact on overall employment, “usually confined to teenagers and unskilled workers”—i.e., McDonald’s workers.
President Obama himself, when he keeps intoning that every job should pay enough to support a family of four, is essentially saying McDonald’s jobs shouldn’t exist.
Though McDonald’s would never put it this way, the company has already started adapting. McDonald’s once filled its U.S. menu with salads, wraps and fruit options that few customers buy. The idea was to appease its foodie critics. Now the company is “simplifying” its menu and giving franchisees freedom to drop non-sellers—and the disproportionate staff needed to support them.
McDonald’s customers were never keen on customization, preferring speed and a cheap price. But now the company is introducing customization-friendly automated and smartphone ordering—because it allows franchisees to cut counter staff.
The essence of Europe’s malaise has long been a politics tilted heavily toward protecting those who have jobs from those who want them, where the biggest losers are the young and unskilled, and where stagnation is the general fate. Even with the bad news of recent years, McDonald’s U.S. stores still generate twice the sales of its competitors, including Burger King. But they also employ twice as many workers, upward of 50 per store. Look for that to shrink as McDonald’s adapts to an America becoming more like Europe, with an economy unwelcoming to the unskilled and unprivileged trying to find an entry into the world of work.


All Comments

  • Posted by 10 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Hi, ekr990011,

    Thank you.

    I think that I understood that long time ago. I was trying to politely show that there is a confusion in how people speak about action, effort, work and product. In my opinion, action is any volitional bodily movement or volitional and conscious thought process. Effort is action directed toward a desirable outcome, which can be a physical product or a result of the thought processes, such as a conclusion. Work is exertion of power, i.e. effort, over some defined time. Product is the result of that physical work or a "communicable recording" of the conclusion (see above) and, sometimes, of the "thought path" to reach it.

    With that in mind, I would say that as long as I am conscious, I myself and nobody else "owns" me. I am enslaved if another can threaten me with bodily or mental suffering, unless I take actions that he commands me to take, contrary to my rational self-interest.

    I see plenty of people misusing the term "slave". The way I understand it, income tax has nothing to do with slavery. Humans, being social animals, always have needed some kind of social structure, i.e. "government". Government produces nothing and, thus, the cost of government must be born by the "governed", i.e. some kind of tax.

    All the best.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ekr990011 10 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The definition of the limit at which one looses the ownership of them self is:
    When someone else can come in and take or own what you produce or do regardless of your opinion on the matter.

    For example:
    If someone takes your work without your consent then you are not free.
    If someone dictates how you act, you are not free.

    "Or: it would seem to me that when one exerts one's efforts, those efforts are by definition one's own."
    That is the point, you don't own your efforts. In a job where that is seemingly the case you are actually paid for your efforts or your work on a given project. Thus your work is yours even if the final product is not.
    However you are no longer free when your efforts are taken without your consent, or a mutually agreeable settlement.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Ben_C 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I live in Ann Arbor - home of U of Mich. I am a speck of red in a sea of blue.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Ben_C 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Agreed. But that is not who my liberal friends complain about. Their perception is that ANY business person is flithy rich. When I suggest we trade bank accounts and they accept my responsibilities and I get their paycheck with their responsibilities I get the "long pause" and they change the subject.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by dbhalling 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Unfortunately, the large amount of cronyism (really fascism) means their arguments have some validity. Plenty on Wall Street and even more in Washington DC did not earn their wealth. Warren Buffet and George Soros get deals that no one else can..
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by dbhalling 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    There is no limit, if someone has a claim on you that you did not freely enter into, then you are a slave.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Ben_C 10 years, 3 months ago
    I get really tired of the "concentration of wealth" arguement from my liberal friends. Few are business owners. Most are employeed by our local university. They seem put out when I respond - "it doesn't matter. What matters is the ability to follow a dream and start your own business. Try it a and get back to me in five years." None have tried - too scary. They would rather keep their job and complain about 'producers.'
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Hi db,

    I hope that you can make yourself a bit more clear. For instance, what is the definition of the limit at which one looses the ownership of oneself? Or: it would seem to me that when one exerts one's efforts, those efforts are by definition one's own. The products of those efforts may or may not have a different owner.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by dbhalling 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    either you own yourself or you don't, If you don't own yourself you are a slave - period. The income tax does not state any limitation. So you don't own your efforts, so you are a slave.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by airfredd22 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Re: freedomforall,
    your last sentence makes my point, it's the word slavery that i find to be the problem. Words have meanings and to use them out of context cheapens your legitimate points. Furthermore, your other explanation of bad experiences for some employees leaves out that they are free to choose another job or start their own business. No one ever promised that work is always going to be pleasant, that's why it's called work and not fun play.

    Fred Speckmann
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 10 years, 3 months ago
    Hey, every job should be able to pay for a family of four, assumes every person should have a family of four. Many should have none, but have many Most that have proven their worth have few.

    If every person should be enabled to raise a family of four, what is the incentive to earn more before starting a family?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    If Ayn Rand had written some of the tripe out of DC that passes for speeches, she would have been laughed off as exaggerating the point. Wait a second ...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Reasons to go to college:

    1) You have not shrugged yet.
    2) You want to be prepared for when the producers are in power again.
    3) You are getting ready for Atlantis until you are recruited, which I just might do if you choose to get ready for Atlantis at Florida Tech.
    4) You have Dagny's need to save what is left rather than Galt's desire to destroy that which has been produced so that it cannot be used against the producers.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by H6163741 10 years, 3 months ago
    Yet another move to further dumb down Americans. Why would anyone go to college or try to advance beyond an entry level position, if they are making $15 an hour flipping burgers? Of course, those jobs will probably not exist. Even McDonald's has a breaking point, and I doubt anyone will pay $20 for a Big Mac.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Hi, Fred, Some do provide services for legitimate businesses and some are wage slaves to looters who produce nothing, treat employees with no respect, and impede progress for others. That was part of the point I was making. Some people have a good work experience and impart that experience to their children. Some have a poor work experience and impart that to their children. You don't think the phrase 'wage slave' is appropriate, but that is the way some people feel about their jobs and that is the experience they pass on to others. Obviously it is a completely different issue than slavery experienced in the early 19th century.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Some speeches coming out of DC are so idiotic that they do have amusement value. Other than that, you are correct, The word given should be changed to any.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by airfredd22 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Re: freedomforall,
    It's a shame that a pointed analysis like yours loses its credibility for using a words like "wage slaves." the people you state are "wage slaves,' are in fact workers that provide the necessary labor that any business needs in exchange for payment as it is valued by both worker and employer. An economy can only function when both parties are satisfied with such an exchange. That does not mean that the value placed on the labor will be a 100% agreeable, but that it is a negotiated agreement and no slavery is involved. To throw around words like slave makes true slavery into a joke.

    Fred Speckmann
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I could not agree with you more. It is palpable to me that Progressives' goal is not to maximize the number of people having "more enjoyable lives", as you phrase it, but control. And that control, not for the "common good", as they spell their excuse, but for direct, ruthless power and the loot that the power brings, a la Sheldon Silver.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by airfredd22 10 years, 3 months ago
    Re: Holman W. Jenkins, Jr.,

    Bravo Sir, you not only have your finger on the problem but have very articulately explained all the factors involved in the potential damage of forcing increased wages on the fast food business.

    Your explanation of the damage corrupt politicians like NY Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver cause to economies in the states or for that matter the Us economy as a whole is also right on the money, pun intended.

    The European examples you p[resented are also 100% on point. Politicians worldwide will never acknowledge that even though they know the truth of the negative effects of high taxes and regulations because sadly their denial of these truths are based on their own corruption. No truer words were ever spoken than by Lord Acton, "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely."

    Fred Speckmann
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by RonC 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    They are available, but have been deemed counter productive to the collective goals of Amerika.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo