12

6 Baltimore officers charged in Freddie Gray's death

Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 9 years, 12 months ago to The Gulch: General
83 comments | Share | Flag

So the decision to bring charges has been made. I am glad it will go before a jury and people will get their day in court. This is how it should be resolved. The looters and rioters have only hurt their cause, their neighborhoods and reinforced unfortunate perceptions of the inner city minorities. A little patience for the system to take its course would have been in order. Even though it looks as though the authorities have decided there is sufficient evidence to charge, there was no excuse for the mayhem and destruction. All that came of it was the recognition that there is a greater number of potential criminals for the cameras to expose.


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 4.
  • Posted by 9 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Hello WiliamShipley,
    I am always willing to let the system work. It is not perfect, but it is far better than most. If only the rioters had the patience to allow it to work, much damage may have been avoided.
    Respectfully,
    O.A.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 9 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    If the jury is stacked with welfare recipients... all of the officers will wish they never tried to "serve" the community. And perhaps some of them are at fault. Fortunately the defense attorney can reject jurors as well as the prosecutor. The problem will be the pool from which they are chosen. I do find it difficult to believe that all 6 officers were culpable, but we will see.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ WilliamShipley 9 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    To be fair, that's what the prosecutor is supposed to do, seek justice on behalf of the people.

    There was an investigation and evidence, I am not privy to it so I won't try to second guess her decisions. Clearly a death in custody requires investigation and the statement that the purpose for the arrest was inaccurate is disturbing.

    Let's see what happens at trial.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 9 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Oh sure.. I hope for that, but I don't expect it. Too far gone. Everything is a game of appeasement. And it started with welfare. ... and here we are.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 9 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I agree. It's so hard for me as an engineer to think like a lawyer. If the prosecutor finds some evidence like someone's DNA at the crime scene, he may actually discourage looking for more evidence because they mind find evidence "contrary to their theory of the case". It's up to the defense to do the same thing-- look for exculpatory evidence and stop looking when they have enough. Each side is not seeking the truth but rather to support their "theory of the case". It's opposite of how I think in engineering.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 9 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Hello LS,
    One can only hope the jury is unbiased, justice is done and that the facts are the decider not the emotion. Prosecutors are by nature imbued with an agenda.
    Regards,
    O.A.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 9 years, 12 months ago
    Prosecutor to protesters, "i seek Justice on your behalf".... says it all.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo