

- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
Previous comments... You are currently on page 4.
When people quote the 'cost' of oil from overseas, from Saudi for example, does that include the transportation cost to get it to the US?
Jan, not an economist
But isn't 'selling at their best price' exactly what the Saudi's should do. Why should they inflate their prices to the benefit of their US competitors in the fracking industry?
Jan
Your point about people believing that economics can be manipulated without an inherent 'cost' is well stated. Physical laws can likewise be manipulated if you take the cost into consideration (we can make a hollow hunk o'metal fly us through the sky, for example).
Thank you both for making valid points.
Jan
...and oil is expected to drop further...the market is dropping with it...we have broken key support levels and a 50% drop like 1932...2000...& 2007 are on horizon...
While the profit picture isn't good for the American suppliers right now, the important thing is maintaining the cash flow to cover debt and expenses. We have a glut of oversupply sitting in Cushing, OK, so releasing that supply to overseas markets will keep the cash coming in, for the short term. If the doomsayers are correct, and the price remains at $20 or less per barrel for the next couple of years, the industry will be in dire straits, unable to generate profit from their most productive wells.
While we like to think of the U.S. as primarily an industrial supplier of finished products, the reality is that commodities are still a major source of income. Oil, natural gas, coal, minerals, crops, and animal products are big export items, and a dramatic drop in demand for any of those items can put a big dent in our GDP.
With "friends" like the Saudis, we need few enemies, as their purposeful distortion of the market, generating oversupply against a shrinking demand is as damaging an assault on our national interest as a military strike. Ironically, the best thing for the U.S. right now would be a shooting war in the Gulf of Oman, stopping Saudi and Iranian oil delivery.
that are as real as the physical principals of gravity or thermodynamics. These economic principals are just as real as the physicals ones and just as difficult to thwart. The "law" of supply and demand is a simplified description of one of these principals. There are close similarities between economic models and those found in physics. Economic systems can be modeled as a recursive dynamic construct. Like the power distribution system it consists of a source, a means of storage, a means of delivery, and a network of loads, or consumers. In such a system it is the load that dominates performance by placing demands on the rest of the system which can either meet the demand or fail.
There is no free lunch, and not in china either. Currently, prices for chinese goods that we buy have been falling. I buy for our company and I see the prices declining. Thats good for us.
Load more comments...