The rise of American authoritarianism
This may add to the discussion I have seen about the whole Trump thing, and why we (as a group) seem so uncomfortable with all of the candidates on both sides. I can see the basic idea being applied as equally to the Democrap candidates as well. It also is a terrifying prospect from an Objectivist viewpoint, as it seems to be the foundational result of a lot of what I saw being expressed in AS. Only a seed shift in the sheeple desire to have a :daddy" state to take care of everything, and allow nothing, can produce this effect. Somewhat chilling, if true.
Previous comments... You are currently on page 4.
Underneath it all, our choice of axioms is influenced by emotional factors. For some years, I have sought to live by an analogue of Occam's Razor - the principle that an axiom which leads to longer healthier happier life is truer than one which leads to shorter, or less happy, or less healthy life.
You've been on this site long enough to well understand that Objectivism is based on rationally, logical reasoning of facts, not on emotional feelings as premises--particularly as studied in Objectivism as you state and lay claim to.
As to your little jibe and snark about my history on the site--well, just 'sticks and stones'....
.
"The American media, over the past year, has been trying to work out something of a mystery: Why is the Republican electorate supporting a far-right, orange-toned populist with no real political experience, who espouses extreme and often bizarre views? How has Donald Trump, seemingly out of nowhere, suddenly become so popular?"
I thought Trump was a typo for Obama and Orange was a typo for "brown."
Whatever.
The success of Virgin Galactic and Space-X do not command your attention as much as does Donald Trump and his mirror image Hillary Rodham Clinton. But they are really irrelevant to your own pursuit of your own happiness.
At the detail level, it might have been interesting to examine support for Ben Carson or Jeb Bush or Whoever, but, ultimately, pointless. Trump and Clinton are the subjects of the discussion.
It isn't rocket science this flirting with Marxist theology is idiotic.
I just think Trump is so popular because he is non-establishment. And, he's saying things people are thinking: things like we should really put a stop to open immigration until we know "what in hell is going on". Such statements are pretty powerful.
In still not voting...for anybody being offered. Every damn one of them comes at this whole thing with the premise that government fixes stuff.
The sooner we all realize that politicians (of any party or leaning) as well as those that make their livings from talking about them and politics in general are not our friends or supporters of liberty, the better off we'll all be. They are power seekers, pure and simple.
Load more comments...