"Man" banned from Princeton.

Posted by Government 8 years, 8 months ago to Humor
44 comments | Share | Flag

Students won't be punished for using it, but the world "man" is being removed from courses and school activities, being replaced by more gender-neutral terms.

Some may see this as an Orwellian side-step, unnecessarily blocking or destroying a useful term for the sake of political correctness. Others see it as a necessary state of evolution. Why, of course, do we use the word "man" to describe one gender and "wo-man" to describe the other. What's with the prefix? "Male" and "Fe-male" does the same thing. Seems like these words were created by men.

Using the words "man" and "woman" is still tolerated at Princeton and can still be used to identify gender, but the insidious imposition of the "man" term will be altered.

Here are some examples of what has changed. (pic related)

A memo from the school read “consistent with style guidelines issued by Princeton’s Office of Human Resources and Office of Communications, and as endorsed by the Institutional Equity Planning Group as a preferred University practice, HR has developed these gender inclusive style guidelines, to be utilized by all HR staff members in HR communications, policies, job descriptions, and job postings."

John Cramer, Princeton’s director of media relations, said the guidelines “reflect the university’s initiative of fostering an inclusive environment.”


All Comments

  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 8 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Laughing Your etc around The Tongue In Your Cheek but Comrades Soros and Lenin would be proud of that group. One of Lenin and Marx dictums was to control the language. Wow Life under Comrade Dear Leader Clinton makes me glad I'm ex patria and living in free North America.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 8 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    depends on the school. they live in their own little la la land. Princeton says no can use man but then in their approved list of words used it three or four times as well as son. Some schools say not at all and some expel students for using it except if it's eubonicsl. So i just ignore the whole thing. Like safe spots it's for snow flakes I see UofChi banned the safe spots good for them.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ puzzlelady 8 years, 8 months ago
    Ayn Rand uses "man" consistently and widely throughout her books. Will they have to be purged? Or simply banned?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by strugatsky 8 years, 8 months ago
    Comrade is a perfect replacement for offensive, gender demeaning and identifying words. Comrade adds sense, meaning and fulfillment to names of entities and makes them appear whole, defined and purposeful - for example, Comrade Obama, Comrade Clinton, Comrade Sanders. Clearly, even the sound of the full and proper use of the term reeks with confidence, respect and strength!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 8 years, 8 months ago
    Originally "Man", the word, was a translation from Hebrew, meaning: Human! Not Gender, Gender is expressed Male or Female and nothing inbetween...no matter What one's retarded brain thinks.
    Male-human, female-human as a connotation of Man/Woman, came later and it wouldn't surprise me to find a progressive type invented it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 8 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Well, if we ban m@n we will have to ban all m@le names, and possibly all proper nouns., like Jo@n or H@rb.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 8 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Laaaadeeeeeeessssss and Gentlemen. Tonight Barbara Striesands 20th annual million dollar fee charity song fest featuring "I don't Know if I could live here. Decisions are soooooo Hard!"

    Just a sample
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mccannon01 8 years, 8 months ago
    I'm wondering. Is this creepy stuff only attacking the English language or are they going to issue guidelines for all languages?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mccannon01 8 years, 8 months ago
    Hmm, not yet consistent. Looking at the published chart they haven't yet dealt with huMAN or MANufacture.

    This is creepy Orwellian stuff, IMHO.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 8 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    "Gent"-leman... Perhaps people will begin to use it in an ambivalent fashion like "guy".
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 8 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    That word goes back to the pre Napoleanic War Days and was used by the smart set in lower and mid society in England.

    Dictionary.com
    ain't. 1706, originally a contraction of am not, and in proper use with that sense until it began to be used as a generic contraction for are not, is not, etc., in early 19c. Cockney dialect of

    London; popularized by representations of this in Dickens, etc., which led to the word being banished from correct English.
    Ain't | Define Ain't at Dictionary.com
    www.dictionary.com/browse/ain-t


    Ain't - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ain't
    Jump to Contractions of to be not - Ain't is a contraction for am not, is not, are not, has not, and have not in the common English language vernacular. In some dialects ain't is also used as a contraction of do not, does not, and did not.
    ‎Etymology · ‎Linguistic characteristics · ‎Prescription and stigma
    Ain't | Definition of Ain't by Merriam-Webster
    www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ai...
    Define ain't: am not : are not : is not, : have not : has not — ain't in a ... In fiction ain't is used for purposes of characterization; in familiar ... contraction of are not.

    It's a negative contraction of the verb to be.

    The song I ain't gotta nobody and nobody's got me translates to I have somebody but nobody has me.

    We ain't got no edjucation is a plaintive cry or plea for help referring to the British education system which gives the 11 Plus Test at age 11 if one fails it's trade school and never a university ergo 'another brick in the wall.'
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo