

- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
The whole 60 vote thing is a smoke screen to CYA Republicans. Not buying it. It's just another excuse from a Party that ignores what the voters want and what they, the Party, ran on.
FOUR PAGES
Maybe I'd add a subtitle: "Your Constituents May See Through Your Deceit Should They Grow Brains. Hi, Paul Ryan."
Or perhaps I'd otherwise rather subtitle write: "I Dream Of Term Limits."
This alone would be huge, and it would not require a new regulation. It would just be a rule saying contracts that are open-ended with no price estimate or pre-agreed price per service or price per unit time are not enforceable.
It wouldn't be requiring them to do anything. It just means they would lose in court if they sent a bill that was not in some fashion agreed to beforehand. The agreement could be by time or by procedure or fixed bid-- anything. But if it just says any and all charges, they would not be able to win a judgement in court.
https://steemit.com/news/@libertylol/...
https://steemit.com/news/@libertylol/...
They didn't die any more frequently before Obamacare, and the cost of insurance was 60% lower than under Obamacare.
Only one that should die is Obama and he isn't subject to Obamacare. Execute the looting traitor.