No one said the body is perfect nor self regulating, it is not a mystical notion to observe that the body, given the right nutrition can heal itself...no need to do anything For it or in Spite of it, just work with it.

Allopathic medicine has Never done Anything good for me...it's only made matters worse and cause other problems to boot.
25 years away from their so called science has proven that to me. No colds, flu, pain, cancer, ebola...Nothing in 25 years!

Just hoppen the old ugly body of old ugly Carl holds out.
You want Mysticism?...knock on wood...laughing

Piffle. I'm not impressed with mystical nonsense about how the human body, in a state of nature, is supposedly perfectly self-regulating. There are plenty of failure modes without good mechanisms to protect against them, just as you'd expect from evolution. I see this as disproof of intelligent design. But allopathic medicine is scientific and does eventually solve problems. If government would just get out of the way, we'd see more and faster progress.

Oddly enough, there is a parallel mystical nonsense belief that the Earth's ecosystem is perfectly self-regulating. Many, but not all, of the same people buy into both.

The problem is with allopathic, so called medicine, is that they address symptoms only, do For and Despite of, the body and what it can do for itself.
They also assume that what ever they do is ok and care not how many react badly to their concoctions; neither do they track what their perversions do to people over time.

My concussion is, big pharma is Not your friend.

I could care less how much they profit so long as they do no harm to the end users of their products...so far, it seems, they have done nothing but harm. They know nothing of what makes each of us different nor why, one man's medicine is another man's poison.

It's stupid for business to aquiesce to theftist opponents without a fight. The Koch brothers argue back and prosper; they ought not be alone.

Big business is the last to defend its own freedom and property rights. The only sensible -- and possible -- solution is for intellectuals to spread the right ideas on behalf of reason, individualism and freedom in order to make it possible for business and everyone else to do it.

The resentment many Americans feel toward Big Pharma is a variant of the same unworthy envy that they feel toward other successful businesses.

The biggest difference is that pharma has to contend with three major handicaps that force them to raise the prices they charge Americans: (1) Overregulation; (2) unfair product liability law (including the lack of a loser-pays rule); and (3) the fact that every other rich country in the world, whether it allows competition with the state-run health service or not, imposes price controls on drugs, thereby forcing American consumers to pay for all of Big Pharma's R&D budget.

I believe the only sensible solution is for Big Pharma to mount a PR campaign explaining to the public that government causes all three problems, and urging the public to demand that government stop causing them.

From a "Newstarget truth bomb" promotion for "Natural News" where "in the United States of America we're censored, everything's censored", a truly Dark "criminalization of science". These "truth bombs" have been promoted on this forum previously.

Apparently she is a bit of a scam artist: https://www.the-scientist.com/?articl...
and: https://www.nature.com/news/2011/1110...

This looks like another attempt to discredit vaccines. I guess the Autism claim is losing traction.

Why is me dino thinking of Galileo and people with power who can't handle the truth?
Way, way worse, why am I making that comparison with a persecuted scientist during the 21st Century?
Way worser than that, why is this happening in the United States Of America?

I won't divulge what I've learned. But...good luck.

Big pharma is not going to be ignored probably a second term effort but it is not an easy fix.

You bet Exceller ,
Sadly this kind of abuse and denial of reality is observed all too frequently.

The question that should be contemplated is: are these scientists/companies afraid of the big bad parasitical trial lawyers or are they really that arrogant/mentally ill and determined to make you sick so they can profit even more.

I think its the latter because they could always alter the process without telling the public as if they found a better way; therefore saving their collective asses.

Somebody tweet President Trumpet and suggest he investigate the "Vaccine Courts".

It is telling, when your boss comes to you and insists you deny the conclusions of your honest work and when you refuse...they put you in jail!

Thank you for posting this Dobrien.

Her case is not that much different from the "consensus" based belief of the "scientific community" in the human cause of global warming. If you are not part of the consensus and deviate from their belief, you are treated as a criminal. Except that I haven't heard of anyone being jailed. I don't know on what basis a scientist can be jailed?