- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
Previous comments...
Given that this is likely an emergency, yes. Rand herself said emergencies have an ethic completely different from everyday life.
So- no, I wouldn't.
It does not work that way.
Especially since you are Implying it was me who killed the population of the planet, whereas the initial question was an either/or alternative.
It is the methodology of the left. Projecting and blaming when there is no foundation for either.
(Will everyone know I did it? Or will my sacrifice be anonymous? Just asking...)
But accepting the challenge as stated in simple terms, my answer is yes.
Not sure I should have replied, given the old man comment. :)