No Big Bang? Quantum equation predicts universe has no beginning

Posted by $ AJAshinoff 10 years, 2 months ago to Technology
270 comments | Share | Flag

It appear that science is never settled. I have to wonder though - perhaps its my human limitation - how something could always be without ever beginning? Interesting position, it kind of makes you wonder about God.


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 4.
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 10 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    No, I haven't read FSOG. I've never called you a liar; misguided perhaps, but I believe your sincerity. If you took that comment as a slight on your truthfulness, then I apologize. While I vociferously disagree on basic perspectives of philosophy, I had no intention of being disrespectful.
    Reply | Permalink  
    • LetsShrug replied 10 years, 2 months ago
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • -1
    Posted by Robbie53024 10 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I'm not going to try to prove/disprove a supreme being to you - you either do so for yourself or not.

    However, I can prove that in the absence of same, man will assume that mantle - hence, Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao, etc. Show me a society without a recognized supreme being, and I'll show you that it has a human that has assumed the mantle.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 10 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Bet you haven't read that either. I don't think I've ever given you a reason to call me a liar, but that's what you just did. It's not about the zombies!! And fifty shades is nothing more than a lesson in crappy writing and a tool to reveal some stupid women for what they are. Fantasy hounds.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by plusaf 10 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Thanks, Robbie... that was fairly predictable...
    So if one cannot prove a negative (that there is NO Supreme Being,) please demonstrate how you can prove the opposite... That there IS one (or more, or any...)

    Atheists would like nothing better than a cogent argument to prove that! Really! We just never seem to receive any!

    Go for it!!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by dbhalling 10 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I mean that if you use the christian definition of god it is clear that god does not and cannot exist.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • -2
    Posted by Robbie53024 10 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    There are two fallacies to your argument. First, that there is not supreme being. And second, that even if there isn't that humans won't assume that mantle. Both are wrong.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by plusaf 10 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Oh, Danger, Will Robinson!
    What you just said, blarman, can too easily be applied to 'discussions' of the same aspects of Religion!

    Shields Up!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by plusaf 10 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    ???... The Big Bang Theory is just that... a theory that appears to explain a LOT of the evidence we've observed with our senses and advanced technological sensors.

    If new facts or observations turn up that prove conclusively that The Theory has holes in it, first, the Theory, like most others, is tweaked to see if it can, with internally consistent logic, account for the 'new discoveries.'

    If it can't, it gets tossed and hopefully replaced with something more inclusive and accurate. If the tweaks appear to work, the tweaks are then open to experimental verification or rejection, too!

    And even today, there are other 'theories' competing with TBB Theory to 'explain what we see and measure right now.'

    Hell, the observation of the theorized Higgs Boson doesn't EXPLAIN 'how gravity works' any more than the discovery of the electron 'EXPLAINS' how electricity or electrostatic attraction WORKS, either!

    :) But those are some of the Real Fun Challenges in Science!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by plusaf 10 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Jan, I thought that the new COSMOS series handled those concepts pretty well, plus the fact that some very complex molecules have been detected in interstellar space, including compounds found in a lot of what we call "organic matter" here on earth!

    Coincidence? Untrue? Created By God to fool/mislead/annoy us? Or yes, the way chemical elements naturally interact makes it quite probable that they will combine in ways that, with appropriate energy supplies and environments, can and will lead to what we call "life."
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by plusaf 10 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    "Having been born does not augur well for the concept of Immortality"... ---Woody Allen, I believe...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by plusaf 10 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Robbie, if atheism or Objectivism have failed to answer 'fundamental questions' about the origin of the universe, how life initiated from inorganic matter or how sentience came into existence, I'm afraid that you're disappointed that those turnips don't yield blood any more than would a stone... any more than a set of x-y coordinates provide answers to questions in the z-axis direction!

    You, again, seem to postulate that, Man Will Assume The Role of The Supreme Being If No Supreme Being [Really] Exists. That Deocentric view implicitly assumes The Existence OF a Supreme Being (God) in the face of atheists' search for proof that one actually exists. Belief of the Existence of a Supreme Being is, to atheists, NOT 'proof' of the Existence of a Supreme Being. "We" atheists see that 'logic' as circular and faulty, while the folks espousing those beliefs appear to make it the be-all/end-all Proof That They're Right.

    And you wonder why the "discussion" is fruitile?
    :)

    And I think the irony of your phrase 'man-made supreme beings' might have escaped you... :)

    If you didn't see the irony/humor in that, I'll try to be explicit: from an atheist's point of view, Your God IS a 'man-made Supreme Being,' so complaining that the ones that cultures or cults create, using flesh-and-blood members OF their groups, creating their own Supreme Beings... seems a funny way to put it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 10 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    ITS NOT ABOUT THE ZOMBIES!! Ugh. And that's not what Saul is about either.. well sorta but oh so much more. Don't knock it til ya try it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 10 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I have no interest in zombies, nor in old English folks. Ancient Romans, perhaps, and definitely Norwegians. Lawyers for drug dealers, probably not.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 10 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Um, I only watch excellent shows. Justified, walking dead, downtown Abby, Spartacus, Viking, call Saul (lol), breaking bad, and certain HG network home reno shows.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 10 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    But is it any good? Too many things continue on (The Daily Show for example) that aren't worth my time.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo