11

Who is it that is expecting a free ride?

Posted by kevinw 9 years, 11 months ago to Politics
89 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

In a recent discussion about patriotism on a post by Abaco here; http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/posts/2e... khalling linked to this Atlas Society video of Alexander Cohen making the case for patriotism as a virtue that Objectivists could embrace; http://www.atlassociety.org/as/john-galt...

That conversation tended to revolve around the vague definition and how people would apply it (or not) to their lives and Mr. Cohen expressed a definition of patriotism that I would much rather have as the standard. But what caught my attention in the video was Cohen's point that people who enjoy the advantages of the system we were left with by the founding fathers but are not willing to put forth the effort to protect it or improve it are, essentially, expecting a free ride. I personally know several people who are completely willing to pick up a gun and fight but will not lift a finger, nor spare a moment's thought on how to stop it before it comes to that. Not even vote. I would say that they don't even truly understand what it is that they would be laying down their lives for.

We've all heard (possibly even said) the phrase "if you don't vote, you can't complain". Now I'm wondering, is voting even enough? Obviously any idiot can vote.


All Comments

  • Posted by johnpe1 9 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    that's it -- we dig and produce and sustain freedom
    to the best of our ability, carrying millions of others
    along with us. . and people like BHO think that the
    productive power of the nation can be milked of its
    profits "to no end." . Rand predicted that they would
    have to be taught a lesson. . she is being proved
    right, I believe. -- j
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 9 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Millions stayed home in the last few elections and has anybody gotten the point? All the "voices" took credit or placed blame for it but nobody "got it". A "none of the above" option would sure be helpful but not happening any time soon.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 9 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Are these people not getting a free ride on your back and my back and the backs of people who have taken the time to learn what the cause of freedom is and put forth some effort to protect and/or bring about (bring back) a system that protects the rights of individuals?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years, 11 months ago
    Sure you can. Not voting is called undervoting. It states a valid political position. What you can't do is vote for None of the Above in a system with a two faced one party system choosing the candidates. I''m leaning more and more to wards the idea of the right to vote or for that matter holding public office elected, appointed or as a consultant shill being earned with something more than ''accident of birth'' as a qualifier. To be able to vote for war I'm leaning more towards veterans only. The rest of society has failed too much and killed too many of us with their cannon fodder baby factory mentality.

    As far as patriotism is concerned I''m considered an expat but consider myself a current patriot if you are talking ÜSA and Constitution. As far as the present government is concerned I've never changed my allegiance from the Constitution of the USA to the present whatever it is and consider their supporters be neverpats.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 9 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    and if we really had a capitalistic system, and if the
    government would stay out of the way, in comparison
    with Russia they would be able to "do their thing,"
    these producers, freely. . in that sense, a "free" ride!
    but the others -- the Eddie Willerses -- who would
    be granted extraordinary livelihoods working for the
    producers, would get a partial "free ride" on their
    coattails. . and the poor would be rich enough to
    donate to the international poor. -- j
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 9 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    So put those guys in, say, communist Russia. If it is early on they become the bourgeois, enemy of the people, head on the chopping block. Later in the process, they might hide their ability to not get singled out or they might be part of the "party" waiting for the next purge. Or, more likely, they work in the black market. Their lives on the line daily just for doing what they do. Capitalism is the only system in existence that lets them profit from their ability and they ignore it. Or maybe just avoid thinking about it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jdg 9 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Illegal immigrants cannot get the EIC because they don't have SSNs (and people filing a 1040 with an ITIN are not eligible).

    Obama's semi-amnesty policy would have changed that by issuing SSNs to those affected, but the courts have stopped it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 9 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I would contend that they are *giving* the free ride.
    and they are non-Galt thinkers -- they don't mind
    being slave-like performers for the "riders" on their
    backs. . maybe they don't notice the riders.

    if they're getting a free ride, it's like the time when
    the horse gets a "free ride" to the barn -- they
    want to go that way, and don't mind being ridden,
    on the way. -- j
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 9 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Plus, when the collapse comes, there needs to be the free market alternative presented such that people see the 'light' and go for it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 9 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    You may be right. An economic collapse may be unavoidable and the pain it causes may prove necessary but it may take a while to run out of other peoples money. And either way, the more Objectivists there are, the better chance we have.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ WilliamShipley 9 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I agree with you on the 'earned income credit'. What I was referring to is that the current immigration describes the immigrants as 'paying taxes'.

    Filing a tax return and getting an EIC is not 'paying taxes'.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Maritimus 9 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I agree with you.

    The shortsightedness of our politics and of the vast majority of voters is painful to observe. I cannot decipher if it is partly caused by the electoral cycles, despite most politicians making it a career of it. My first guess would be that it is all rooted in the fact that sheeple do not see farther from their noses.

    The need to design the system you mention was behind my comment about who decides what and how.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 9 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    All this is true.

    So what would your thoughts be on someone who, by shear natural ability, produces enough wealth that even with the system working to destroy or enslave him he is able to live comfortably and do his own thing and ignore that system. Is he getting a free ride?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 9 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Absolutely true, but isn't it more than that? I know many people that produce a great deal and have so much more to lose than the average joe but they make no effort to understand the system that allows them to produce so much. Some complain about the system and some don't but their natural ability to produce allows them to completely ignore the failing system that they gain so much from. They pay their taxes into a system that would have them destroyed or, at least enslaved, and yet they are able to basically ignore all that and "do their own thing". It seems counter-intuitive but aren't they getting a "free ride" as well?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 9 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I agree Objectivism education is key. But, I think that this country has gone too far already to socialism to stop it without an economic collapse like in Venezuela, where people can see firsthand the pain socialism causes. THAT would be the time to promote Objectivism more effectively. Today, socialism is treated like its the panacea to every ill, and we still have enough wealth to redistribute around and make it look like its working.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 9 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    " it will take a heluva upheaval to get it back on track."
    No less than a philosophical revolution. Glad to hear that you're not giving up. I think it is important for people to realize that this part of the battle was never won in the first place.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 9 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes, education is the key. But it must be education of the right ideas. Currently liberals are in charge of the educating and the conservatives are fighting hard for that control but not pushing the right ideas. By conservatives, I mean the religious left (more commonly known as the religious right) and those who won't challenge their rights violating assertions because they believe them to be on the same side.

    Every opportunity must be taken to promote the right ideas. IE.. Objectivism
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 9 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Hello William,
    Ayn Rand said it was moral to collect social security as restitution but only if you are against it as a policy and work to end it. It sure would be easier to phase it out if those living off of it could not vote to continue it. (never going to happen anyway)

    My new reply to those who say "I paid into it, it's my money" is "it is not your money. They spent Your money. Now they are stealing it from your grandchildren to give it to you.Did you do anything to stop that?"

    I'm all for a slow phaseout of social security, even if it means I will still pay into it and have nothing to collect. That would still be better than the total collapse that is coming.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 9 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Hello Maritimus,
    This is a good question, but there is a contradiction there. Is it truly in ones rational self interest to vote for things that benefit him if he has to evade the fact that those benefits must be taken from someone else? It cannot be if A=A
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 9 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Since we're talking hypothetical, a properly set up military pension would be a private retirement plan between you and a firm of your choice into which you have paid your own money and you would no longer be getting a check from the government. This would eliminate the conflict of interest without eliminating the benefit of a military career.

    And Thank you for your service.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 9 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Absolutely agree. The current tax system is immoral at best and criminal is not too extreme of a description so to tie voting to that system would not be a good idea. As long as there are taxes on property (also immoral) then those who don't own property should not be able to cast a vote that could effect those tax rates. And if you receive a check from the government, or even get special tax status, how could it be right for you to be able to vote to continue or increase your own benefits that others are paying for.

    Of course a proper government would eliminate most of those restrictions, and might make someone think twice about seeking a career in politics too.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 9 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    This subject should rouse that sort of emotion. It has been a well perpetrated fraud. No apologies necessary.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by cjferraris 9 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    It's just another example of the POTUS kicking the can down the road.. He's going to leave it for the next inhabitant of the White House and the lack of memory will cause all of the people in love with this president to be in denial about how long he drug out this recovery.. With any other President I can remember, you would usually have about 4 years of "good times" with about a 18 month "recession" thrown in just to tighten the belts after the recovery. Not a 6 year recession followed by an alleged 2 year "recovery".
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 9 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    and vote with your bucks! . this could include going
    by Chick-Fil-A instead of Starbucks. -- j

    p.s. buying American has wrinkles -- do a little
    homework and buy a Jetta made in Chattanooga?
    .
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo