Why universal basic income is gaining support, critics or The destruction of our Republic
It's back again...
"He figures the plan would cost about $1.75 trillion a year. Ending welfare programs would save about a third of that. Another third could come from ending the tax deduction for mortgage interest and other write-offs. The remaining third could come from new sources such as a tax on carbon emissions or financial transactions."
1/3 through "ending welfare programs" - will never happen but okay...
1/3 through "ending the tax deduction for mortgage interest and other write-offs" - So they are going to take my mortgage interest deduction away and give it to someone else.
1/3 through more taxes - robbing Peter to pay Paul again
Also, this is paper napkin figures, government will double the cost with half the production.
"He figures the plan would cost about $1.75 trillion a year. Ending welfare programs would save about a third of that. Another third could come from ending the tax deduction for mortgage interest and other write-offs. The remaining third could come from new sources such as a tax on carbon emissions or financial transactions."
1/3 through "ending welfare programs" - will never happen but okay...
1/3 through "ending the tax deduction for mortgage interest and other write-offs" - So they are going to take my mortgage interest deduction away and give it to someone else.
1/3 through more taxes - robbing Peter to pay Paul again
Also, this is paper napkin figures, government will double the cost with half the production.
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
I don't know exactly, but it will be as big a chance as the industrial revolution eliminated most jobs. I think it will increase production by the same amount, creating a world of plenty unrecognizable to people from before the revolution.
When you say a "huge application process to determine need," I think of the socialist system at the motor plan in AS. It gives a good description of to whom people would submit their application.
If you can build one device that sells into all those markets, even it is a bit more expensive it will be preferable to designing, building and supporting separate product lines. Plus you will be much more agile in meeting emerging needs.
Once it becomes practical, it will be inevitable.
The key application is home assistance. With nursing homes exceeding 75K a year and an aging population there is an amazing need and budget for a general purpose home assistant. And if it can do that job, it can do pretty much anything.
Demographics says we're in trouble if we don't do this!
No need for general purpose machines as that is a complex endeavor with little profit on the return building the AI and mechanics. A dumb machine is quicker and cheaper.
Once this threshold is reached, then it will capable of replacing the jobs done by 95% of humanity.
Up til now automation has replaced repetitive, well-defined tasks. When it can replace ill-defined ones then what?
Unless the government will 'guarantee jobs' by outlawing automation.
Wait -- change that LOL to chuckle. Wait -- change that chuckle to a grim smile. Wait -- change that.....Oh, hell just forget it. It's just too stupid to contemplate.
You are a day late and a dollar short; the republic has been destroyed.
Just keep in mind that we are seeing, experiencing the ALTRUISTIC movement taking over the country. and it has been in the works for over 100 years.
This would be called "for the universal better good."
Me age 70 but I think I've ample time to see something like that.
After all, I started to see the flag being burned back during the 60s.
Load more comments...